Why did Hillary give “factually false” testimony under oath in the investigation of the White House Travel Office firings, as former Independent Counsel Robert Ray stated in his final report.
Ray said his office found “overwhelming evidence” she played a role in the dismissals of the seven longtime employees in the White House travel office, which she denied under oath.Why did Hillary give “factually false” testimony under oath in the White House Travel Office firings?
Hold on there, Romare.
That investigation into dirt on the Clintons put several people in jail who were in on Whitewater with her, including Jim Guy Tucker, former Gov of Arkansas.
That whole operation was her project, and everyone went to jail but her. That doesn't make the investigation a 60million failure, it just means that one got away. It was a successful investigation.
And we've always known that the Cattle Futures deal was a $100,000 bribe. It couldn't have been anything else. What we don't know is whose bribe or what the quid pro quo was.Why did Hillary give “factually false” testimony under oath in the White House Travel Office firings?
I'm wondering why you are still fixating on something that may or may not have happened many years ago. Who cares???
Does it bother you that our government spent $60 million+ of your taxpayer money to try to dig up financial dirt on the Clintons and basically came up with nothing???
Her desire to cover her own **** was greater than her desire to be truthful with her testimony.
Ha ha ha ha ha yeah the left conveniently forgot about everything the Clintons did. Its like water on a duck just rolls off. They all say oh If that really happened and or that was a long time ago why should that matter today?? You stick it too em it matters ';stupids'; because Mrs Bill Clinton is running for your next president. I love it!!!!
No one can speculate on that - that's a question for Hilary and her alone.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment